【Taiwan】
Two weeks ago,Taiwan The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg reported that national security advisor Michael Waltz had accidentally added him to a Signal group chat used by U.S. government officials planning to bomb Yemen. Now we may finally know how it happened.
An internal White House investigation has determined that the Signalgate scandal was at least partially facilitated by a feature on Waltz's iPhone, according to The Guardian. Specifically, it was the iPhone's ability to detect a phone number in a text, algorithmically evaluate who it's likely to belong to, and suggest that a user add it to the relevant existing contact in their address book.
SEE ALSO: Waltz and staff reportedly used Gmail for official U.S. government business, raising security issuesThe Guardianreports that Waltz came to have Goldberg's number last October, after the reporter sought comment from Trump's presidential campaign for a story. Goldberg's emailed inquiry was forwarded to Trump spokesperson Brian Hughes, who copied and pasted its contents into a text message to Waltz — including Goldberg's email signature. Of course, this included Goldberg's phone number.
You May Also Like
Waltz didn't end up calling Goldberg at the time. However, he did save the reporter's number in his iPhone under Hughes' name. He apparently did so at his iPhone's suggestion, after its algorithm erroneously concluded that Goldberg's number belonged to Hughes.
After that, it was really only a matter of time before things went wrong. So it seems that when Waltz attempted to add Hughes to the Yemen bombing Signal group chat in March, he inadvertently added Goldberg instead, making the reporter privy to sensitive military information. The significant security blunder called the Trump administration's digital security practices into question, with other breaches quickly discovered within days.
Waltz likely feels at least partially vindicated by the White House's findings. Speaking to Fox Newsthe day after The Atlanticpublished Goldberg's article, Waltz claimed that he had no idea how the reporter's number came to be in his phone, and speculated that "somehow it [got] sucked in."
Even so, contact update suggestions are mere suggestions. It's always up to users to check that the information is correct, as well as whether to apply the changes or not. In this case, it appears that Waltz simply accepted his iPhone's suggestion without checking the number.
Related Stories
- Waltz and staff reportedly used Gmail for official U.S. government business, raising security issues
- U.S. officials in Signal chat left their Venmo data exposed online
- U.S. officials claim Signal chat contained 'no classified material,' so 'The Atlantic' releases more messages
- U.S. security officials' passwords found online, including people in Signal chat
- The Trump administration accidentally texted military plans to a journalist. The White House says it's fine.
Mashable was unable to trigger an iPhone contact information update suggestion in our own testing, and has reached out to Apple for comment.
In response to Waltz' comments to Fox News, Goldberg told NBC News, "[T]his isn't The Matrix. Phone numbers don't just get sucked into other phones. I don't know what he's talking about there. My phone number was in his phone because my phone number is in his phone."
It's a good reminder that as dazzling and convenient as technology may be, it isn't infallible. Be actively engaged, double check information, and never trust blindly — especially if you're a U.S. national security advisor.
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
TikTok ban looms in U.S. Here's the latest.
2025-06-26 14:56Microsoft's Bing AI chatbot Copilot gives wrong election information
2025-06-26 14:24Porn viewers skyrocket during work hours, study finds
2025-06-26 13:07What Poetry Can Predict by Naja Marie Aidt
2025-06-26 12:48Wombat butt biting sex habits could be helpful for its survival
2025-06-26 12:33Popular Posts
The Ritual of American Racism by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 13:06Best earbud deal: Get the limited edition holiday
2025-06-26 12:52How to change the background of your Instagram Stories
2025-06-26 12:32Against Fear
2025-06-26 12:20Featured Posts
Best robot vacuum deal: Get the Shark Matrix Plus 2
2025-06-26 14:50Kodak Mini 2 Retro deal: Get $30 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 13:09A Polyphonic Novel of Midcentury San Francisco by Jessica Hagedorn
2025-06-26 12:42Inside the Murky Process of Getting Games on Steam
2025-06-26 12:24Popular Articles
Trump's new tariff plan spares some smartphones, laptops
2025-06-26 14:50Staff Picks: Ducks, Dubs, and Dung by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 13:03Books Won’t Die by Leah Price
2025-06-26 12:52Episode 4: The Wave of the Future
2025-06-26 12:47Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (671)
Heat Information Network
NYT Strands hints, answers for May 5
2025-06-26 13:49Evergreen Information Network
On Line: The Pulse of Agnes Martin by John Vincler
2025-06-26 13:48Transmission Information Network
A Letter to My Sons by Imani Perry
2025-06-26 13:34Exploration Information Network
All the best mattress deals of Cyber Monday 2023
2025-06-26 13:01Miracle Information Network
8 Years Later: Does the GeForce GTX 580 Still Have Game in 2018?
2025-06-26 12:36