【Canada】
Normally when a social network updates its terms of service,Canada barely anyone notices. But that's not the case with Instagram's newest Terms of Use, which have caused quite an uproar among sex workers online.
The issue that's drawing notice is the platform's Community Guidelines. They require adherence to Facebook's Sexual Solicitationrules, which is not a new addition to this version of the terms — but it's continued inclusion is a big concern for sex workers who reach their audience on the platform.
Facebook, which owns Instagram, states in its policy that users can't post sexually explicit and implicit content, including suggestive emojis or references to "wetness" or an erection. This, as you can imagine, makes it difficult for people to promote sex work.
Instagram has said, both in a statement to Mashable and a subsequent tweet, that the new terms are focused on clarifying how the app uses data to serve personalized ads; what data advertisers receive; and licensing and IP usage. They did not change any of the language around the posting of sexual or suggestive content.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The tweets' purpose, according to an Instagram spokesperson, was to clarify that their policies will not change when the new terms go into effect on Dec. 20. Instagram may have meant to reassure users, but for many in the sex work community, it was unwelcome news.
A history of being targeted
Across social media, sex workers, educators, and others in the sex industry have dealt with this issue for years. On Thursday, Rolling Stone's EJ Dickson reported that sex workers are getting "purged" on TikTok. Last year, sex worker and journalist Erin Taylor reported on Instagram censoring and shadowbanning of sex workers, particularly queer creators.
There are dozens of recent claims on Twitter from the sex work community that Instagram is lying and has, in fact, targeted them by banning them from the platform. For many sex workers, sex educators, and the like, social media is critical to their livelihood. It's often their first interaction with potential clients. Platforms like Instagram can be someone's main marketing platform, said Taylor Sparks, sex educator and founder of online intimacy shop Organic Loven.
It can take years to build up a social media following, and to have it taken away in an instant — without warning or explanation — can be devastating. Sparks told Mashable the nebulous guidelines offered major social networks can threaten sex worker safety and make sex education inaccessible on a platform where it previously thrived.
"Instagram and Facebook guidelines will have sex educators, tantric coaches and professional Dommes walking on eggshells because you don’t know if those monitoring your page will consider the word penis or dick more offensive," Sparks said. She compared their guidelines to the Hollywood Hays Code, a set of censorship guidelines which among other things required married couples to sleep in separate twin beds on television.
Restricting basic sexuality does more harm than good.
Restricting basic sexuality does more harm than good, according to Sparks, as it censors information that's both wanted and needed. Especially in the United States, sex education is sorely needed: Only 24 states and D.C. mandate sex education, while just 34 states mandate HIV education.
The proof of this need, Sparks noted, is clear by follower counts and the number of interactions sex educators see on their pages. "If it was such an off-putting topic it would clearly show in the numbers," she said.
Sex educator and performer Kenneth Playsees social media as a lifeline for fellow educators and experts, as well as those outside the industry.
"There are countless educators who have each helped thousands understand and feel empowered by their gender and sexual identity whose digital support has supplemented what many individuals lack in their personal communities," said Play, who's garnered over 12 million views on Pornhub with his sex ed content. Educators like him fear they may now be limited in their content distribution, he continued, and Instagram's rules and their vague enforcement will continue to cause unnecessary anxiety.

It's yet to be seen what will come out of Instagram's updated terms. If the only changes are about data collection, that means that Facebook's Sexual Solicitation guidelines still stand. "Nothing will change" insinuates that accounts from people in the adult industry will continue to be banned for violating these rules. As demonstrated by the response to Instagram's tweet, "nothing changing" won't help sex workers.
When asked by Mashable if it removes accounts that link out to sites like OnlyFans, for example, Instagram's spokesperson said:
We don't take action simply because accounts post OnlyFans links, we take action if these links are shared alongside content attempting to share or offer sexual materials, or coordinate sexual encounters between adults.
The explanation doesn't add much clarity; could an OnlyFans link itself be considered "content attempting to share or offer sexual materials"? What constitutes sexual materials?
Instagram's spokesperson said they have an ongoing dialogue with sex worker organizations. But they declined to say which organizations, instead linking to Facebook's community standards page on stakeholder engagement.
Related Video: How influencers are ruining OnlyFans for sex workers
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Best Amazon Fire TV Cube deal: Save $30 at Amazon
2025-06-26 12:27Sheila Heti and Kathryn Scanlan Recommend by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 12:25Conversations to the Tune of Air
2025-06-26 12:18Teonanácatl by Alejandro Zambra
2025-06-26 11:57No Time for a Negative Peace
2025-06-26 10:30Popular Posts
Redux: Naked Lightbulb by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 12:15By Your Name by Madeleine Schwartz
2025-06-26 11:44Redux: An Ordinary Word by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 11:39Featured Posts
U.N. confirms the ocean is screwed
2025-06-26 12:44Redux: Conceptual Baggage by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 12:31Redux: Another Drink by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 12:21Cooking with Sergei Dovlatov by Valerie Stivers
2025-06-26 11:18Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
2025-06-26 10:10Popular Articles
Contingent No More
2025-06-26 12:34Do Not Et Cetera by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 12:00Anthony Cody, Poetry by Anthony Cody
2025-06-26 11:32Wolf Moon by Nina MacLaughlin
2025-06-26 11:05Mary Shows Up
2025-06-26 10:13Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (2728)
Happiness Information Network
NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for April 26: Tips to solve Connections #215
2025-06-26 12:44Creative Information Network
Jesse McCarthy, Nonfiction by Jesse McCarthy
2025-06-26 12:37Neon Information Network
Sheila Heti and Kathryn Scanlan Recommend by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 12:24Style Information Network
Vesna by The Paris Review
2025-06-26 11:52Wisdom Information Network
Best earbuds deal: Save 20% on Soundcore Sport X20 by Anker
2025-06-26 10:54