【2022 Archives】
Twitter announced022 ArchivesThursday that it would be expanding "Birdwatch," a crowdsourced project designed to combat misinformation.
Introduced last year as a pilot program, Birdwatch allows contributors who are in good standing with the social media company to address tweets they find misleading and provide context in the form of a note. Previously, notes created by the pilot's 10,000 contributors appeared on a separate test site. As of March 3, however, the company says that a "small (and randomized) group of people on Twitter" in the U.S. will be able to see and rate the quality of the Birdwatch notes, according to a recent blog post.
For a note to show up in a tweet, it must be rated as helpful by enough Birdwatch contributors from different perspectives. Thanks to Twitter's new partnerships with Reuters and The Associated Press, the quality of Birdwatch notes will also be assessed with feedback from the news agencies.
The announcement comes in the midst of Russia's invasion of Ukraine — unverified information has easily spread on social media platforms and Russia is known for its robust use of misinformation and propaganda. Misinformation on Twitter, in particular, has long been an issue, which is what led to the development of Birdwatch in the first place. This situation in Ukraine has also put a new emphasis on how other social media companies are responding.

The decision to expand the Birdwatch pilot is based on "promising results" from surveys with Twitter users, and feedback from the pilot contributors and academic researchers. According to an internal Twitter survey, "people were 20 to 40 percent less likely to agree with the substance of a potentially misleading Tweet after reading a note about it, compared to those who saw a Tweet without a note." Examples of notes on the Birdwatch test site include contextualizing a quote from Vice President Kamala Harris who was explaining the complicated Ukraine/Russia situation in simplified terms to six-year-olds. Or noting that an image of Paul McCartney waving a Ukrainian flag onstage was from 2008.

With Birdwatch and other features, Twitter appears to be more proactive in fighting the spread of misinformation. But the question of its efficacy remains. According to The Washington Post, only about 43 tweets a day were being flagged by Birdwatch contributors.
SEE ALSO: In the Russia-Ukraine information war, encrypted messaging apps provide opportunity and riskTopics Social Media X/Twitter
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Waymo data shows humans are terrible drivers compared to AI
2025-06-26 14:44Lenovo leads the global PC market in Q3 · TechNode
2025-06-26 12:55The Made in America iPhone: How much would it cost?
2025-06-26 12:14Popular Posts
Meta continues its submission to Trump with new advisor on its board
2025-06-26 14:42Xiaomi launches smaller TV S Pro version in China · TechNode
2025-06-26 14:09The Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones are on sale for $100 off
2025-06-26 12:19Featured Posts
The Best Gaming Concept Art of 2016
2025-06-26 14:29JD to reduce on
2025-06-26 12:43The 10 Most Anticipated PC Games of 2016
2025-06-26 12:31Popular Articles
Stop Preordering Video Games
2025-06-26 14:32Cotti Coffee registers multiple trademarks for baijiu
2025-06-26 12:46Douyin upgrades one
2025-06-26 12:26Your 'wrong person' texts may be linked to Myanmar warlord
2025-06-26 12:25Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (6862)
Progress Information Network
Robin Triumphant
2025-06-26 14:27Feast Information Network
China sees livestreaming sales hit RMB 1.27 trillion in the first half of 2023 · TechNode
2025-06-26 14:19Habit Information Network
Alibaba to bet big on small merchants for Singles Day with RMB 2 billion subsidies · TechNode
2025-06-26 14:01Micro Video Information Network
TikTok takes further action amid disinformation on the Israel
2025-06-26 13:18Unique Information Network
Testing Windows 10 Performance Before and After the Meltdown Flaw Emergency Patch
2025-06-26 12:50