【chinababe | Adult Movies Online】
California sees the looming privacy apocalypse on chinababe | Adult Movies Onlinethe horizon, and just took a small step to avert it.
On Tuesday, the state that many major American tech companies call home moved to ban the use of facial-recognition technology on recordings gathered by police officer cameras. The bill, signed into law by governor Gavin Newsom, is being hailed as a win by privacy advocates across the state.
"Let this be a warning to the companies and police departments rushing to adopt this dystopian technology," wrote the ACLU. "We will defend our right to privacy."
You May Also Like
Interestingly, the bill is not limited specifically to facial-recognition tech — but rather, pertains to biometric surveillance in general. This potentially includes other forms of identification, like gait analysis, that could be gathered from police body cam videos.
"This bill would prohibit a law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer from installing, activating, or using any biometric surveillance system in connection with an officer camera or data collected by an officer camera," it reads.
The passage of the bill follows San Francisco's move earlier this year to ban the local government's use of facial-recognition tech for the purpose of surveillance, and suggests a growing consensus that the problematic and prone-to-error technology has no place in law enforcement.
"The use of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance is the functional equivalent of requiring every person to show a personal photo identification card at all times in violation of recognized constitutional rights," reads the bill. "This technology also allows people to be tracked without consent."
SEE ALSO: Here's why San Francisco's vote to ban facial-recognition tech mattersThe bill takes effect on Jan. 1 of 2020 and expireson Jan. 1 of 2023. Notably, it only applies to law enforcement's use of such technology — not the private sector's. Still, government contracts are how many private companies — such as Amazon — profit from this invasive form of surveillance.
Depriving them of California's law enforcement as a potential client sends a strong message. Time will tell if anyone listens.
Topics Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Philips now allows customers to 3D print replacement parts
2025-06-26 07:25'Zelda' Pornhub searches skyrocket after game release
2025-06-26 07:10The Answers Are Not Important: An Interview With Catherine Lacey
2025-06-26 07:08Where Do We Go When We Read?
2025-06-26 06:23Popular Posts
Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
2025-06-26 07:37Twitter's blue couch saga is dividing the timeline
2025-06-26 06:588 Bose Cyber Monday deals: QuietComfort Earbuds II and more
2025-06-26 05:44Amazon Pet Day: All the best deals
2025-06-26 05:37Featured Posts
Every MCU movie villain ranked, from "Iron Man" to "Thunderbolts*"
2025-06-26 08:06Satirizing Identity Politics: An Interview with Lexi Freiman
2025-06-26 06:57Apocalyptic Office Novel: An Interview with Ling Ma by Madeline Day
2025-06-26 06:34Why is everyone serving c*nt all over my Twitter timeline?
2025-06-26 06:03Popular Articles
The cicadas aren't invading the U.S.
2025-06-26 07:16Staff Picks: Portraiture, Patriarchy, Public Works
2025-06-26 06:47The Vanishing of Reality by Michiko Kakutani
2025-06-26 06:27Contingent No More
2025-06-26 06:11Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (89538)
Happiness Information Network
Samsung Unpacked stream is set for May 12, 2025
2025-06-26 07:46Miracle Information Network
A Conversation Between Nell Painter and Lynne Tillman by Nell Painter and Lynne Tillman
2025-06-26 07:14Fashion Information Network
Cyber Monday unlocked phone deals: Apple, Google, Samsung, more
2025-06-26 06:59Prosperous Times Information Network
Cooking With Buchi Emecheta
2025-06-26 06:32Dream Information Network
Best soundbar deal: Save $300 on the Sonos Arc
2025-06-26 05:33