【2006 Archives】
Google image searching006 Archivesabout to get slightly less annoying. Emphasis on slightly.
The search engine giant announced Tuesday that its iconic image search feature is going to get, well, some new icons to clarify things a bit before you click on an image.
On the search page itself, you'll start seeing small badges on the lower left corner of each result letting you know if they came from shopping pages, recipe websites, or YouTube videos, for example.
You May Also Like
Mousing over them will give you more specific information.
Check out Google's example below.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This is pretty handy, if not especially revolutionary. Everyone who regularly looks for pictures on Google has run into a situation where the image they wanted to save was actually a video thumbnail or part of a shopping page that made it slightly harder to click through and save it. Giving users a quick heads-up before they click through is a nice change.
SEE ALSO: 15 times things got weird on Google Maps, in honor of its 15th anniversaryUnfortunately, change often comes at a cost. These new icons will take the place of the image dimensions display that currently shows up when you mouse over a search result. This is what I'm talking about, in case you never noticed that before:

For some reason, Google is relegating that lower-left dimension counter to the view that comes up when you click on a thumbnail. It'd be a little silly to act like adding an extra click to see image dimensions was a major inconvenience, but maybe that could've been moved to the lower right corner of the initial search view.
Either way, you better get used to the new order. Here's hoping the very marginal change to Google image searching doesn't disrupt your daily routine too much.
Topics Google
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
At the Columbia University Strike
2025-06-25 23:30Georgia Houghton’s “Spirit Drawings” Were Ahead of Their Time
2025-06-25 23:25How We Imagined a Female President Would Look in 1992
2025-06-25 22:52Heartbroken? The Museum of Broken Relationships Is Here for You
2025-06-25 22:18No Country of Civil Men
2025-06-25 21:20Popular Posts
Ruthless Take Downs
2025-06-25 23:03Road Trip: Paintings by Greg Drasler
2025-06-25 22:57One Night Only! The Implosion of the Riviera, Monaco Tower
2025-06-25 21:55How We Imagined a Female President Would Look in 1992
2025-06-25 21:32The People’s Platform Goes to Washington
2025-06-25 20:59Featured Posts
No Left Turns
2025-06-25 23:18Habitat for Humility: Voluntourism in Lesotho
2025-06-25 22:34In a Vast Collection of American Folk Art, Something for Everyone
2025-06-25 22:24From Gods to Guns: How Our Stories of War Have Changed
2025-06-25 22:15Getting Schooled
2025-06-25 21:18Popular Articles
The Dog Delusion
2025-06-25 22:23Thomas Mann’s Brutal Review of His Older Brother’s Novel
2025-06-25 22:21Ken Price’s Candy
2025-06-25 21:47We’re Both Dippy Over Him, and Other News by Dan Piepenbring
2025-06-25 21:37Preserve Yourself!
2025-06-25 21:10Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (763)
Storm Information Network
Podcast. Podcast. Podcast. Podcast.
2025-06-25 23:22Unique Information Network
The World of ‘Garfield’ Parodies Runs Deeper Than You’d Dreamed
2025-06-25 21:54Sky Information Network
Brushes with Greatness: My Inconsequential Encounters with Celebs
2025-06-25 21:46Transmission Information Network
We’re Both Dippy Over Him, and Other News by Dan Piepenbring
2025-06-25 21:38Opportunity Information Network
Through the Eyes of Men
2025-06-25 21:19